View Single Post
Old 02-22-2009, 05:29 PM
Altoid701's Avatar
Altoid701 Altoid701 is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 50

I'm definitely for two separate fastest solver times or a weighted ranking system. I switched over to being a 100%-er because it didn't feel right to me to skip over the ones that took a long time. Yeah, it sucks when one takes you 800+ seconds to solve it and it increases your solve time by a second, but every puzzle should count for a true average solve time, IMO. And you should be penalized for not completing a quote, I think. I've considered just doing 75% next month to see what my solve time would be, but I doubt I actually will. It doesn't feel right.
Reply With Quote